Science is changing so fast these days we must keep up with the change and re-adjust our beliefs accordingly. At the source of the new science is the belief of that reality is manifestation of the inner subjective experience not an objective one. The biggest breakthrough in this belief has been quantum theory. In the last hundred years of science this has changed dramatically. We are still in the momentum of that change as the understanding of unseen realities and energies are found to be very much affecting who we are, what we are and the world.
"Feelings and emotions coexist, but have independent roles in our life. Feelings are not the same as emotions. Feelings are holographic in nature, arising from the synergistic response of an individual on all levels in the moment. You cannot quantify a feeling, whereas an emotion is a whole other matter, and always has a counterpart, for good reason.
Emotions, such as anger, bitterness, and jealousy are energetically calibrated to and in the third dimensional reality and are reactive in the dualistic positive/negative relationship. Each emotion has it opposite vibratory reflection. They are designed to alert the system of imbalances in its relationship with the environment, and they are the energetic power to correct the imbalance if the person knows how to allow this energy-in-motion, emote, while remaining aware and connected with the physical/etheric reality, while staying grounded, until a solution is reached, and the overcharged emotion dissipates into neutrality. We are a full spectrum people and should experience all emotions, to keep us in check at the other end of the spectrum, such as being calm, accepting and understanding of others’ motives. These emotions are instinctual in nature, whereas feelings are an intuitive response in nature. Feelings are like an integrative field of light, whereas emotions are a specific energy force, like a current ...."
We've come across fascinating articles and studies on the Purple Vibration and its positive influence on enzyme production and diabetes. It will be fully described in our spring release. For those who have the Purple Filter and Expansion Insert you may want to explore this combination in these areas on an energetic level in the etheric field. Please email us for more information. In the meantime I hope you are able to join us at one of our upcoming classes. Enjoy a PDF of Maximojo and the Wand of Light and my favorite book: Color: Awakening the Child Within.
Vibration and Thought: Blueprints of Life Book - FREE PDF
Explore Geometry in Lumalight System. PDF Download Chapters 1-4
Maximojo and the Wand of Light- FREE PDF
Download Full Book. Share with Others
Color: Awakening the Child Within- FREE PDF
Download Full Book. Share with Others
Upcoming Lumalight Weekend Workshops
Special Prices on Preordered Lumalight Sets
Sidney, IL November 2, 3 - Sold Out
Portland, OR, November 9, 10, 11
Phoenix, AZ, January 11, 12 (13th Geometry Option)
Las Vegas, Spring 2014
Richmond, VA March 28, 29, 2014
Boston, MA Spring 2014
Miami, FL Spring 2014
Register online or by phone (416) 340 0882 (EST) info @ spectrahue.com
Lumalight Annual Sale Extended October 30
Select a Lumalight Color & Geometry System for your practice or personal use today.
Ready to expand your set?
View All Color and Geometry Options
Spectrahue. We're on your wavelength.
Discover more about the Spectrahue Color Harmonics System and the Lumalight
Spectrahue Color Harmonics, Lumalight Facts and Theory more ...
To remove your email from our list hit return and write "unsubs cribe " in subject line. Send as a regular email.
If you have more then one email, please include both as your email may be linked to another one.
Our sincerest apologizes for the inconvenience. Thank you for understanding while we update our system.
Spectrahue Light & Sound Inc. Box 85507, Toronto, Canada M5N 0A2 (416) 340.0882
Things reaching a peak – on many levels?
Seems to me everything is getting more exposed,
and with that, more attempted suppression.
Of course content does have to be checked – there are a lot of
unstable people attempting to get attention.
And, suppression of new facts have been a regular feature in science.
This article may explain a recent experience we had locally.
There was a TED event held in our local town, Byron Bay.
Sabine sent in my details – and we did not even hear back from them
to say why we were not considered suitable for inclusion.
In fact, that suited me. What I have come realise, more and more,
is that I would like to stay as invisible as possible.
Part of that is because I do not enjoy attention, but the main part
is that it is so easy for people to divert their attention to the speaker
rather than to the content of what they are sharing, and the effect
it has on then when they hear it.
From Natural News
TED talks now routinely censoring scientists who share ideas on consciousness
(NaturalNews) The "TED talks" organization, once founded on the idea of spreading good ideas, has become the new priesthood of status quo dogma. The TED organization doesn't want you to hear the really important, breakthrough advancements in scientific thinking, and to enforce that intellectual ignorance, it has resorted to censoring and suppressing two of the most important scientists our world has ever produced.
This is being accomplished by a cowardly board of "anonymous scientific advisors" who have seized control of TED's talks while hiding behind a curtain of anonymity. These "scientific advisors" no doubt represent the interests of Big Pharma, biotech and the corporate-dominated "science" sellout community that's desperately trying to crush any real revolution in scientific understanding.
While TED is positioned as trendy and cool, it's actually just another vehicle of idea suppression that has joined with other dark forces which are attempting to keep humankind ignorant of the reality of consciousness, free will, spirituality and the fact that our cosmos is far more than physical "stuff." TED gladly features scientists who unveil technologies that will be used to enslave humanity, but the organization doesn't want you to hear about advances in understanding that can set you free.
Graham Hancock and The War on Consciousness
Perhaps the most prominent victim of TED censorship and idea suppression is none other than Graham Hancock, author of the now-censored TED Talk called, "The War on Consciousness."
Although it was de-listed by TED, the video was archived on YouTube, so you can still watch it here:
As you'll see in this talk, the idea that humans might have consciousness was so offensive to the TED high priests that they felt the talk needed to be suppressed and "removed from circulation."
"Some speakers use the language of science to promote views that are simply incompatible with all reasonable understanding of the world," says TED. "Giving them a platform is counterproductive. [So] we've appointed a board of scientific advisers. They are (deliberately) anonymous, for obvious reasons."
Obviously, they're anonymous because they are hiding from anyone being able to scrutinize their decisions.
Keep in mind that, throughout history, "scientific advisors" once insisted the Earth was flat. "Scientific advisors" claimed inhaling mercury would cure the flu. "Scientific advisors" once thought there were only four vitamins necessary for complete human nutrition.
If the history of science has taught us anything, it's that scientists are perpetually delusional in their belief that they know everything. Why should we suddenly believe that the scientists of 2013 somehow know everything when the scientists of 1985, 1945, 1897 and earlier are now known to have been foolishly and arrogant incorrect about so many things? And why should we believe any anonymous board of scientific advisors who are, themselves, beyond any measure of scrutiny?
"Science" is not a set of facts and knowledge; it is a process of questioning reality, seeking answers, advancing and expanding our understanding even as we rewrite old scientific truths with new ones.
But TED thinks the calendar of scientific advancement reached its final end point in 2013. There is apparently nothing new to learn! And thus a board of anonymous, cowardly "scientific advisors" who are hiding from public view is now able to selectively censor whatever ideas they don't want discussed in a public forum.
TED has become a "secret society" of the high priesthood of corporate-backed junk science
Such an approach is wildly un-democratic, utterly lacking in transparency and integrity. It puts TED in the category of a high priesthood -- a "secret society" of controllers -- who decide what you can and can't explore in terms of ideas. In this way, TED completely discredits itself and devalues all its presentations because at this point you have to assume all the "allowed" TED speakers have been reviewed and approved by this secretive science advisory board which may very well consist of scientists working for Monsanto, GlaxoSmithKline and other criminal corporations who destroy life for profit.
Watch Graham Hancock's video to find out for yourself just why his ideas are so dangerous that TED felt compelled to censor them:
Graham Hancock, by the way, isn't the only scientist being censored by TED...
TED censors Rupert Sheldrake and his talk on "The Science Delusion"
In his widely-celebrated TED talk, Rupert Sheldrake went right to the point and exposed the "delusion" of modern-day science. What delusion is that? The delusion that our bodies, our minds and indeed our entire universe are nothing but physical stuff. "Materialism" is the fairy tale on which nearly all of modern science is based, and materialism is a delusion.
Sheldrake, author of "Science Set Free," opens his talk with this statement:
The science delusion is the belief that science already understands the nature of reality in principle, leaving only the details to be filled in.
Right there, Sheldrake probably got banned from TED's secret board of "scientific advisors," whose collective egos probably couldn't even fit in the conference room where this TED talk was being delivered.
Scientists get absolutely infuriated when you tell them they don't know everything. Today's status quo scientists have become so convinced they know everything that anyone who challenges their view of reality, consciousness, materialism, cosmology, origin of the species or other similar concepts is immediately branded a heretic and attacked or censored.
Here is the link to Rupert Sheldrake's "upsetting" video:
It is crucial to note in all this that TED is playing mind games in its explanation of why it chose to censor these important scientific talks on consciousness and the nature of reality. In TED's explanation, which is also posted anonymously so that TED's own high priests can hide behind the curtain of anonymity, they explain that talks are censored because of "quality" issues.
Yet this explanation is, itself, an outright lie. In terms of presentation quality, both Hancock and Sheldrake are world-class presenters. They both speak with authority, without making any noticeable presentation mistakes, and they both have obviously brought a tremendous amount of research and thought to their presentations.
There is no "quality" problem with their presentations.
What's really going on here is that TED is censoring them because of the CONTENT of their presentations, not the quality of the presentations. When Martin Luther King uttered that people should be judged "on the content of their character, not the color of their skin," he meant that ideas are more important than outside appearances.
Yet TED is exercising a kind of "scientific racism" by suppressing and censoring people whose ideas put them in the minority, and whose rise would threaten the church-like institutions of scientific power that currently dominate the world (GMOs, Big Pharma, nuclear weapons, etc.). In action and in spirit, TED insults humanity, conspires to block human understanding and gives a nod to all the systems of enslavement that have keep human beings in chains, both figuratively and literally, for centuries.
At the risk of invoking a terrible era of injustice when one group of people were kept suppressed by another group who thought themselves superior, TED is your "intellectual massa," and TED thinks of Hancock and Sheldrake as its slaves who must be kept in shackles, lest they teach all the other slaves scientific literacy. And gee, then they'd have a real uprising on their hands, and that's bad for the science plantation status quo that keeps the pharma / vaccines / GMOs / weapons industries humming for profit at the expense of humankind.
So TED decides to figuratively strap Hancock and Sheldrake to a whipping post and publicly giving them a bloody lashing by prominently censoring their talks. It's not just about punishing these individual offenders, as you well know: it's about sending a message to all the other slaves that they'd better not talk about "ideas worth spreading," lest they too find themselves tied to a post and whipped to the point of public ridicule.
In real U.S. history, slaves were kept under control through a policy of forced illiteracy. Teaching a slave to read was a criminal offense. Today, TED is practicing the same thing in a much more profound and dangerous way. Through its selective censorship of talks on consciousness, it is pushing forced illiteracy on the subject of consciousness, making sure no one spreads the "dangerous" idea that you are a conscious being with a free will and a non-physical, spiritual component which is not bound by materialism and cannot be measured under a microscope.
Why the idea of consciousness is so dangerous to conventional science
To really understand the desperation behind TED's censorship and attempted suppression of ideas from people like Hancock and Sheldrake, you first have to understand why the idea of consciousness is so incredibly dangerous to the mythology of modern-day science.
According to virtually all modern-day "conventional" scientists, all humans are biological robots who utterly lack consciousness, free will, and anything resembling a non-physical mind. They insist there is no soul, no God and that all spirituality is complete bunk. Meditation and prayer are hoaxes, they insist, and there is no such thing as premonition, intuition or other psychic phenomena of any kind.
The entire system of corporate-driven science that dominates the world today depends on this "materialistic" delusion of the world. If scientists admit that humans have consciousness, then suddenly companies like Pfizer wouldn't be able to continue conducting vaccine medical experiments on children <http://www.naturalnews.com/023654_Pfizer_drug_experiments.html> . If scientists admit a non-physical soul survives physical death, then suddenly it makes sense that people are held accountable for their actions, and then the "scientific" pollution of the world with chemicals, mercury, GMOs and other toxins sounds downright sinful. Drug companies might even have to stop committing felony crimes <http://www.naturalnews.com/036417_Glaxo_Merck_fraud.html> to stay in business!
If doctors admit the existence of the mind, then suddenly they cannot claim 100% power and control over the health outcomes of patients. The very idea that a patient has free will and consciousness threatens the power dominance of all conventional medical doctors. So fighting the idea of consciousness is essential to protecting the medical monopoly that enriches drugs-and-surgery doctors.
Essentially, if consciousness is embraced, all the science books have to be re-written. Because suddenly there's another force in the universe that can't be explained with quarks and muons and the so-called "God particle." Scientists hate to re-write their books and lectures. And they sure don't want to be seen as ever being incorrect about anything. So they will defend their outmoded, flat-Earth delusions to their dying day.
TED, it seems, is all too happy to further those delusions for as long as possible, holding back humanity from any real revolution in consciousness -- the very kind of revolution that's essential for helping humankind achieve lasting progress.
About the author: Mike Adams is an award-winning journalist and holistic nutritionist with a passion for sharing empowering information to help improve personal and planetary health He has authored more than 1,800 articles and dozens of reports, guides and interviews on natural health topics, and he has published numerous courses on preparedness and survival <http://programs.naturalnews.com/> ,
Have comments on this article? Post them here:
comments powered by Disqus <http://disqus.com>
Extract: "Perhaps we have constructed theories such as relativity and quantum theory with a similarly limited view, in thrall this time to a sense of space and time that might not exist beyond ourselves. "We think time and position and so on are important variables for describing the world because we evolved to perceive them," says Rudolph. "But whatever is going on down there doesn't seem to worry about them at all.... Maybe so!! And maybe not! - This is somewhat difficult reading, and the conclusions are strange indeed! (And surely it's more interesting, informative and fruitful than yet another bash fest.)"
Our planet has come a long way in scientific breakthroughs and discoveries. Mainstream science is beginning to discover new concepts of reality that have the potential to change our perception about our planet and the extraterrestrial environment that surrounds it forever. Star gates, wormholes, and portals have been the subject of conspiracy theories and theoretical physics for decades, but that is all coming to an end as we continue to grow in our understanding about the true nature of our reality.
In physics, a wormhole was a hypothetical feature of space time that would be a shortcut through space-time. We often wonder how extraterrestrials could travel so far and this could be one of many explanations. Although scientists still don’t really understand what they have found, it does open the mind to many possibilities.
Turning science fiction into science fact seems to happen quite often these days and NASA did it by announcing the discovery of hidden portals in Earth’s magnetic field. NASA calls them X-points or electron diffusion regions. They are places where the magnetic field of Earth connects to the magnetic field of the Sun, which in turn creates an uninterrupted path leading from our own planet to the sun’s atmosphere which is 93 million miles away.
NASA used its THEMIS spacecraft, as well as a European Cluster probe, to examine this phenomenon. They found that these portals open and close dozens of times each day. It’s funny, because there is a lot of evidence that points toward the sun being a giant star gate for the ‘gods’ to pass back and forth from other dimensions and universes. The portals that NASA has discovered are usually located tens of thousands of kilometres from Earth and most of them are short-lived; others are giant, vast and sustained.
As far as scientists can determine, these portals aid in the transfer of tons of magnetically charged particles that flow from the Sun causing the northern and southerns lights and geomagnetic storms. They aid in the transfer of the magnetic field from the Sun to the Earth. In 2014, the U.S. space agency will launch a new mission called Magnetospheric Multi scale Mission (MMS) which will include four spacecraft that will circle the Earth to locate and then study these portals. They are located where the Earth and the Sun’s magnetic fields connect and where the unexplained portals are formed.
NASA funded the University of Iowa for this study, and they are still unclear as to what these portals are. All they have done is observed charged particles flowing through them that cause electro-magnetic phenomenon in Earth’s atmosphere.
Mainstream science continues to grow further, but I often get confused between mainstream science, and science that is formed in the black budget world. It seems that information and discovery isn’t information and discovery without the type of ‘proof’ that the human race requires. Given that the human race requires, and has a certain criteria for ‘proof’, which has been taught to us by the academic world, information can easily be suppressed by concealing that ‘proof’. It’s no secret that the department of defence receives trillions of dollars that go unaccounted for and everything developed within the United States Air Force Space Agency remains classified. They are able to classify information for the sake of ‘national security’. Within the past few years, proof has been emerging for a number of phenomenon that would suggest a whole other scientific world that operates separately from mainstream science.
First step: The work with false memories in mice provided detailed clues to how such memories may form in human brains.
False memory planted in mouse brain, scientists say
The finding is yet another cautionary reminder of how unreliable memory can be in mice and humans
The vagaries of human memory are notorious. A friend insists that you were at your 15th class reunion when you know it was your 10th. You distinctly remember that another friend was at your wedding, until she reminds you that you didn't invite her. Or, more seriously, an eyewitness misidentifies the perpetrator of a terrible crime.
Not only are false, or mistaken, memories common in normal life, but researchers have found it relatively easy to generate false memories of words and images in human subjects. But exactly what goes on in the brain when mistaken memories are formed has remained mysterious.
Now scientists at the Riken-MIT Centre for Neural Circuit Genetics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology say they have created a false memory in a mouse, providing detailed clues to how such memories may form in human brains.
Steve Ramirez, Xu Liu and other scientists, led by Susumu Tonegawa, reported on Thursday in the journal Science that they caused mice to remember being shocked in one location, when in reality the electric shock was delivered in a completely different location.
The finding, said Tonegawa, a Nobel laureate for his work in immunology, and founder of the Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, of which the centre is a part, is yet another cautionary reminder of how unreliable memory can be in mice and humans, and adds to evidence that he and others first presented a year ago in the journal Nature that the physical trace of a specific memory can be identified in a group of brain cells as it forms, and activated later by stimulating those same cells.
Although mice are not people, the basic mechanisms of memory formation in mammals are evolutionarily ancient, said Edvard I. Moser, a neuroscientist at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, who studies spatial memory and navigation and was not part of Tonegawa's team.
At this level of brain activity, he said, "the difference between a mouse and a human is quite small." The part of the brain in which the memories formed is an area of the hippocampus called the dentate gyrus, which is similar in mice and humans.
"What I find fascinating about this," Moser said, "is that you actually can point to a physical substrate to memory," what the researchers call an engram. Neuroscientists have long talked about engrams, but Moser said the research this year and last was the closest they have gotten to pointing to a spot in the brain and saying, "That is the memory."
In the research reported on Thursday, Tonegawa's team first put mice in one environment and let them get used to it and remember it. They identified and chemically labelled the cells in the animals' brains where that memory was being formed. The mice were not shocked in that environment.
A day later, in a completely different environment, the researchers delivered an electric shock to the mice at the same time that they stimulated the previously identified brain cells to trigger the earlier memory.
On the third day, the mice were reintroduced to the first environment. They froze in fear, a typical and well-studied mouse behaviour, indicating that they remembered being shocked in the first environment, something that in reality never happened. The researchers ran numerous variations of the experiment to confirm that they were in fact seeing the mice acting on a false memory.
The tools of optogenetics, which are transforming neuroscience, were used to locate and chemically label neurons and make them susceptible to activation by blue light transmitted by a fibre optic cable in the mouse brain. With these techniques the researchers were able to identify and chemically label which neurons were involved in forming the initial memory of the first environment, and to reactivate the labelled cells a day later with light.
Tonegawa said that, because the mechanisms of memory formation are almost certainly similar in mice and humans, part of the importance of the research was "to make people realise even more than before how unreliable human memory is," particularly in criminal cases when so much is at stake.
That unreliability, he said, prompts a question about evolution: "Why is our brain made in such a way that we form false memories?"
No one knows, he said, but he wonders whether it has to do with the creativity that allows humans to envision possible events and combinations of real and imagined events in great detail. That rich internal experience fuels work in the arts and sciences and other creative activities, he said.
"Unless you have that kind of ability, there is no civilisation," he said.
But it could also provide a lot of raw material for false memories. Perhaps he said, our faulty memories represent "a tradeoff for this tremendous benefit."
New York Times